Saint exupery little prince pdf

The Little Prince pdf. The gadget spec URL could not be found. When faced with the prospect of needing to buy -another- copy I constantly provide them away , I lastly bought the tough cover. The illustrations are unbelievable. Spend the additional money just for them.

You miss so much by needing to associate with the paperback, much smaller sized, illustrations. Katherine Woods translated this popular novella book into English from French. The Story of this popular book is about a young prince traveling in space from one planet to another planet in search of love and friendship to escape his loneliness.

On the planet Earth, he met the pilot, the narrator, in the middle of the Sahara desert and tell him the story of his life and experiences. Through this story of the prince, the author addressed the different complex traits founds in the adults. The author used the story of the young prince to address the different issues and traits found in the adults such as narrow-mindedness.

He used the events of the story to explain these traits and address them in an interesting way. If you have any queries or suggestions regarding this book then tell us in the comment section below or contact us. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. This essay is not unique. Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper. Want us to write one just for you? We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience.

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. Get help with writing. Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you. Your time is important. But I know Le petit prince , and I started trying to guess what word was what, just reading without looking anything up. It was amazing to see how well this worked. The first time I saw this, there were only a couple of words I felt at all sure about.

Upp and var must be the same words as in Swedish "up" and "was". The words mynd and kind weren't like anything I recognised, but they were common, and having already come across them I realised they must be "drawing" and "sheep". I recalled that there was a sentence something like this near the beginning of the story: it all made sense. How does it work? I've been reading deep learning theory, and it's tempting to conceptualise it in terms of strengthening of neural pathways.

This word occurs quite often. The same thing happened with numerous other words. As I'm sure many language geeks will attest, it is such a weird and interesting feeling to find the sense emerging from words which initially looked like gibberish! I'm sorry if I've gone into too much detail here, but I wanted to explain what I mean when I say it's like doing drugs.

You actually feel the text changing your state of consciousness. Well, I'm hooked. Though so far, I've just barely started: the grammar is still a mystery to me. All the same, on my latest read-through I notice that the endings of nouns and verbs, which are first looked quite random, now seem to be displaying some recurrent patterns First, I thought it would be a good exercise to try copying out the text of Litli prinsinn : this would force me to look carefully at every letter, and also give me a machine-readable version that I could analyse.

I'm now about three-quarters of the way through he has just said goodbye to the fox. I tried running my incomplete corpus, which contains about ten thousand words, through a script that Not and I developed last year. The script is simple but quite useful. It counts frequencies for all the words in the corpus, then builds a hyperlinked concordance which shows me up to ten examples for each word. Every word is clickable, so I can take a word I'm unsure of in a sentence and see examples of that word in other contexts.

There is a master index which lists all the words in descending frequency order. Here are the first 50 lines. I tried walking down the list to see when I stopped feeling confident. When I look at words occurring two or three times, I start to feel uncertain, but I still think I know the majority of them.

The words which only occur once are of course the hardest; but even here I feel I can guess a lot, perhaps a third to a half of them. Copying out the text has sharpened my understanding of the grammar a good deal, and now I recognise quite a few endings.

Though I'm still pretty hazy about the nouns. With multiple genders, multiple cases and marking for definiteness, there are many combinations, and I only know the most common ones. It's surprising that one can extract so much information from a tiny sample of just ten thousand words.

I made a small improvement to our script, so that it now creates an alphabetical index as well. This is very useful for finding copying errors: if I see two words close together which are almost the same, that often means that one of them is an error.

Tidying up my copied text is not as tedious as I thought it would be. It's forcing me to look very carefully at everything and consolidate my extremely sketchy vocabulary. I am sure there are still many errors left, but after this initial cleaning up pass I can look at my alphabetical index and get further on trying to understand the grammar. Here's a section showing forms of the word stjarna , "star", which occurs often in Litli prins.

But what are all the others, most of which look like inflected forms? I can click on any of them and get a hyperlinked page of examples.

Most of the others are similar. Hm, looks like this is a dative singular? My suspicions are reinforced by the fact that Swedish used to have a dative; it disappeared long ago, but still survives in a couple of fixed expressions like till salu , "for sale", which has this -u ending.

Still a great deal more grammar to figure out! There are some improvements to the script that I hope to add soon, and which might help It now creates a hyperlinked version of the original text, with the words colour-marked to show how frequently they occurred in the text you've read so far. The initial version uses four colours. Words are in black if they occur more than five times, blue if they occur four or five times, green if they occur two or three times, and red if they occur once.

Here's an example, the start of the visit to the Drunkard: The colours let you see at a glance approximately how well I now understand the text. At the-third planet lived drunkard. The-visit there was very? Only two words, stutt "short"? I'm pretty much guessing stutt from context. This was an easier passage than average, and usually there is more red. But it feels motivating to think that, as I copy out more text and process it through the script, the red tide should start to recede I'm still waiting for The Little Prince to return.

View all 16 comments. Oct 30, Alejandro rated it really liked it Shelves: paranormal , romance , science-fiction , politics , religion , magic , drama , novel.

Beautiful reading! It was a quick reading, it took me like a couple of hours. Wonderful book. All those things and more that you can find in the book, they will be whatever you need to be. You just need to recognize what will be the rose, what will be the fox, what will be the small planet And then, and only then you will be able to realice the power behind of this cute little book. So, not matter if you are in a desert or a little planet most likely an asteroid , be prepared to take flight and be ready with paper and a pencil, since who knows?

Maybe the Little Prince will need you to draw something beyond the evident View all 38 comments. It just feels like meeting an old-time friend. Just what we all need at the moment! It really made me feel so happy to re-read this book again. I have limited time, and I try to focus on new books. And since we are asked to remain at home as much as possible, I thought this would be a great moment to re-read this book.

The Little Prince will always remain my favourite! I cannot carry this body with me. It is too heavy. And now, it became our final goodbye. Where I live everything is so small that I cannot show you where my star is to be found. It is better, like that. My star will just be one of the stars, for you.

And so you will love to watch all the stars in the heavens And, besides, I am going to make you a present View all 10 comments. However, what separates this from the other two is that this is a book for all ages. There was a magazine called "Imprint" now defunct during my childhood, in India.

It used to publish literary articles and stories. My father got official copies and he brought them home regularly. One issue contained this story, and he gave it to me for reading. I was maybe at that time. It left an indelible impression on my mind: I was sad for the little prince and his proud rose, and constantly worried whether the goat would eat it. I chuckled at the silly grownups on the various planets, following their inane pursuits. I was sad when the fox and the prince had to separate, after he had tamed it.

And I broke down and cried at the end. I read this book again after a long time I was still sad after reading it-but now the sorrow had a deeper meaning.

It was the death of childhood that I was reading about. This book is an absolute treasure. Postscript July 22, - I gave this book to my son a couple of days back. Hopefully he'll read it - he has yet to fully transform into a silly grown-up. As such, I'm not pretentious enough to think my thoughts on it matter, so I'll keep this short. I have challenged myself to read one classic a month this year, and so far, I am failing miserably. It's July almost August, but I'm throwing myself a bone so I feel like less of a loser and I have only read two.

This one and Peter Pan of which 2 Stars I know this is a much loved, much published, children's classic that has been published in pretty much every language there is. This one and Peter Pan of which I also completely missed the plot. And yes, I chose both of them because they are short. And geared for children. So I figured they would be easy to read. If only I had really let my loser truly shine and work for me for once and waited three more days to finish it. Then I would at least be three for seven.

But I digress. I'm starting to think children's classics might not be for me. Or whatever the case may be. Regardless, I am just finding them to be very boring and I just can't get into them. I'm gonna try Dorian Gray next though.

NOT a children's classic. So hopefully I have more luck. Fingers crossed. Jan 11, Fabian rated it really liked it. He knew, like an astute psychoanalyst, precisely which images to use to convey the mere representation of Mortality. Le Petit Prince is the Everyman who has a deep passion somewhere inside of him and only with childlike wonder and awe he asks questions on top of questions: no matter the degree of absurdity is he able to show us glimpses of it.

Externalizing feelings like only a child can. I find the golden-tressed titular child a very peculiar emblem in the middle of the Saharan desert So, kids, let me ask you this one: Are we just placed on this planet so as to remain forever View all 3 comments. View all 11 comments. Dec 20, Rajat Ubhaykar rated it really liked it. Written as a children's book, I find myself unable to pin down firmly as to what makes The Little Prince such a universally likeable book, be it children or grown-ups.

What makes it the Hotel California of literature? Is it because most grown-ups secretly love being treated like kids? I think as a grown-up you ought to know better than that. Grown-ups like to be petted around now and then in jest, but that's the end of it.

Often, when grown-ups are indeed treated like kids and they're not in the Written as a children's book, I find myself unable to pin down firmly as to what makes The Little Prince such a universally likeable book, be it children or grown-ups. Often, when grown-ups are indeed treated like kids and they're not in the mood, there is a tiny matchstick inside each one of them, an insecure ego which flares up angrily like it has been wildly struck against a matchbox.

In my experience, grown ups like to be taken very seriously. Very very seriously. Is it the clear, simple language? No, it can't be just that. There have been books that have been written with clarity and have been criticized by pedants and pontificating bores for their simplicity. Grown ups like to feel wise and learned by having claimed to read complicated texts that engaged them at an 'intellectual' level.

They don't like important things being pointed out to them in simple language, after all they're the know-it-all grown-ups and don't need anybody patronizing them. Is it because the book is so short and grown-ups are always keen on finishing books real quick?