Chrome download pdf keep discard

Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Podcast Making Agile work for data science. Stack Gives Back Featured on Meta. New post summary designs on greatest hits now, everywhere else eventually.

Related Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled. Now You: Blocking file downloads without notification, good thing to protect users or user unfriendly behavior?

Surely everyone needs to learn how to check their downloads for malware no matter whether the source is download via Chrome, Firefox, mail attachment or some other source! Pigs … they do. The best they do is create a false sense of security. I guess what Google intents to do here is a mix of security and privacy improvement.

In other words, not downloading stuff that can be seen or change during transit. In , there were an estimated 2. You are volunteering to teach the 2. Is it really bottom-feeder vs. Or normal user vs. That truth is people have been lulled into this garbage by the likes of schmucks like google which also have an agenda at hand to have a walled garden and total control in similar fashion to apple.

I am a computer scientist. The easiest solution by far is to stop using google for your browsing needs you would be doing yourself a favor anyway. Just because they foisted their garbage upon you many years ago by bamboozling you to download and install their browser many years ago along with their toolbar does not mean you should continue to use them. There are other similar options such as ungoogled-chromium, brave, vivaldi to name a few that may not have such restrictions in place.

Stop using google only to support insecure downloads? Nobody foisted their garbage upon me and Chrome is no garbage. You miss the main point. People need to learn basic precautions.

It is not about somebody else doing it for you or teaching you how to do it. You know the risk. You need to learn how to look after yourself. I agree with you entirely on that thought. People do need to learn the basic precautions. People do need to learn how to look after themselves but this is the problem, companies like google put us all into a handbasket and force such measures upon us all because of a few bad apples. Maybe Google should prompt users upon installation which version to install, the baby, hold your hand version or the normal average user that way they can also implement all the rubbish features such as this on the crayons and finger paints version and all the advanced features that a normal user would expect and more on the targeted version.

Mircrosoft are pretty much the same also. Google invests together with Apple the far most money and efforts to find out what their user want. You do not decide what people need to learn. People may not know the risk or they may know the risk and do not care. I worked in IT security for a decade. For instance mobile Firefox was now released without any way to disable Google download and browsing protection for advanced users.

Google gets to know what you download and can track specific sites. Pigs indeed. Concerning for sure. Mozilla was once a different entity but it has slowly descended to what we have before us now. They are perhaps beyond redemption now because the wheels have been in motion for so long at this point. Yeah it happened to me the other day and I was clueless.

Thanks for the explanation. Switched to Vivaldi for main browsing. Chrome team is full of jerks forcing behaviors often. No options kept for end users. I unistalled it about 18 months ago.

Felt food when I did it, and nothing has happened since to change my mind. Has anyone else noticed that color registration is off in the latest Chrome? For instance, yellow comes out as a yellow-green shade. However, the solution is simple: you should add the entire web to exclusions of secure content. Thank you Martin for this useful article, it gave me the idea of how to solve my stream radio problem. Thanks again, Martin. Google Chrome: Never used it, and never will. Just switch to another browser and tell Google to take a hike.

The problem is that while marketing itself as the independent alternative, Firefox follows closely what Chrome does, so that Google can enforce its policies on Firefox users too. Firefox forks should be used to limit the damage. Can you provide some examples of Firefox following Chrome closely?

I want to know these things so that the next time I talk to a FF fanboy I will bring them up. I only know about the FF android fiasco extension support and about:config removal. Works great and I can even use legacy Firefox extensions. I have had absolutely no security problems. I am not doubting your claim that Firefox follows closely what Chrome does but can you give a few examples?

I would really like to know. Also which Firefox fork do you recommend? I am looking for a new browser that is similar to FF for my win7 machine. What if you copy the hotlink and paste it in a new tab? I never encountered this, so I had no need to try it, but I guess it should work. Garbage like this is why I use Pale Moon.

That garbage from pale goons that keep spinning years old unsecure moozilla code might not track but deliver a nice malware bundled into their pale web browser straight from their compromised windoze servers they cannot secure by themselves.

Who are the certified experts? How quickly will I get my solution? We can't guarantee quick solutions - Experts Exchange isn't a help desk. We're a community of IT professionals committed to sharing knowledge. Our experts volunteer their time to help other people in the technology industry learn and succeed. Plans and Pricing. Contact Us. Certified Expert Program. Credly Partnership.